Knees and Joints Hurt…Try this Natural Remedy

It is no doubt that most peopel have heard of glucosamine .And some manufacturers add something called chontroiton.  I am going to share an article by Dr. Frank Painter explaining  how glucosamine works and why adding chontroiton does not benefit you when you use a oral supplements. That is why Shaklee,the number 1 natural food supplements do not make their Joint Health product with chondroiton.

In the mid 1950’s a Japanese researcher discovered glucosamine, an active nutrient associated with cartilage regrowth. We had thought until then that joint problems were the result of a lack of calcium. Now scientists have found that glucosamine restores damaged cartilage cells and helps reduce inflammation. Glucosamine works by stimulating the production of large complex molecules called proteoglycans. Cartilage and other connective tissues are made up of numerous proteoglycans that interact with fiber like collagen and chondrocytes, to maintain resiliency and health. There is a fallacy about chondroitin as an agent which can increase the potency of glucosamine.

Glucosamine hydrochloride (eg Shaklee’s product) was chosen instead of glucosamine sulfate (which implies chondroitin) for a number of reasons. The hydrochloride form is more concentrated than the sulfate (chondroitin) form, and the hydrochloride form contains substantially less sodium per effective dose than the sulfate form. Glucosamine sulfate is stabilized with sodium chloride (table salt) and can contain as much as 30% sodium. This is a consideration for individuals who want to reduce their dietary intake of sodium. Glucosamine hydrochloride offers the promise of the same efficacy as glucosamine sulfate, since glucosamine is not absorbed intact with its carrier. The body doesn’t care how it gets glucosamine as long as it is bioavailable. Nonetheless, we embarked on clinical research to prove the efficacy of the hydrochloride form. We first conducted pilot testing, which indicated benefit for those with osteoarthritis. We then went forward with a full-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial with glucosamine hydrochloride, the results, of which, are published in the Journal of Rheumatology listed in the references on the next page. Results showed a strong, beneficial effect for between 60 and 70% of the subjects, compared to their baseline symptoms. Chondroitin A number of glucosamine products tout the inclusion of chondroitin, a cattle-sourced compound, as a necessary and beneficial addition to glucosamine products. Such contentions are misleading. Tests showing the benefits of chondroitin involved direct injection by syringe to the affected part of the body. In an orally-taken compound, chondroitin doesn’t make sense because it is essentially destroyed during the digestive process. Scientific evidence does not show that a glucosamine-chondroitin combination is any more effective than glucosamine by itself. Other clinical studies Dr. Michael T. Murray, a proponent of glucosamine sulfate, has pointed to a clinical study in Canada that involved glucosamine hydrochloride to make claims about the superiority of glucosamine sulfate. A close look at the study shows that, in actual fact, half the subjects were shown to benefit from glucosamine hydrochloride with the placebo response almost as positive. “Pharmacokinetics of glucosamine in man” (Setnikar et.al.), a study referencing the bioavailability of glucosamine, states that after oral administration, glucosamine sulfate is rapidly split into glucosamine and sulfate ions and absorbed. After absorption, the sulfate ions enter the blood stream where a steady level already exists. None of the clinical studies performed with glucosamine sulfate indicate that sulfate contributed to the benefits shown in the study. As a matter of clarification, while this study references glucosamine sulfate, it was actually glucosamine hydrochloride that was radiolabeled and used to prove the bioavailability of glucosamine. We can conclude that since sulfate and hydrochloride are not the key building blocks for the production of joint cartilage, it makes no difference whether glucosamine has a sulfate or hydrochloride carrier, in terms of bioavailability. In summary, chondroitin has no scientific rationale for an orally-taken glucosamine product. There is no evidence to suggest that glucosamine sulfate offers advantages over glucosamine hydrochloride. There is no need for glucosamine hydrochloride to be stabilized with salt. Hydrochloride offers a more concentrated form of glucosamine. Given these facts, the glucosamine product of choice for consumers should be Glucosamine hydrochloride that is found in Shaklee’s Joint Health

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Be Sociable, Share!
About the Author

Caroline Heinemann has a Bachelor’s Degree in Education from Concordia Teachers College in Seward Nebraska. She has coordinated a variety of educational programs in her local community and conducts regional business training events and teleconference training calls. She become personally interested in health when she experienced some personal health issues and found that alternative medicine has been the key to her health. She shares tips on staying healthy. She is a former and teacher and has owned her own health education business for the past 30 years

Leave A Response

This blog is kept spam free by WP-SpamFree.